bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 63,052.89
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 3,070.04
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 538.25
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 0.492897
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.453721
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 1.00
matic-network
Polygon (MATIC) $ 0.694562
binance-usd
BUSD (BUSD) $ 1.00
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.155666
okb
OKB (OKB) $ 58.94
polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 6.62
shiba-inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB) $ 0.000022
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.112651
uniswap
Uniswap (UNI) $ 7.02
wrapped-bitcoin
Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) $ 63,115.91
dai
Dai (DAI) $ 1.00
litecoin
Litecoin (LTC) $ 78.48
staked-ether
Lido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 3,064.81
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 137.17
avalanche-2
Avalanche (AVAX) $ 34.41
chainlink
Chainlink (LINK) $ 13.50
cosmos
Cosmos Hub (ATOM) $ 8.11
the-open-network
Toncoin (TON) $ 6.22
ethereum-classic
Ethereum Classic (ETC) $ 26.08
leo-token
LEO Token (LEO) $ 5.87
filecoin
Filecoin (FIL) $ 5.95
bitcoin-cash
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) $ 469.03
monero
Monero (XMR) $ 123.72
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 63,052.89
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 3,070.04
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 538.25
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 1.00
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 0.492897
binance-usd
BUSD (BUSD) $ 1.00
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.155666
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.453721
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 137.17
matic-network
Polygon (MATIC) $ 0.694562
polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 6.62
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.112651

Forbes Says XRP Has No Objective, Calls XRPL a Ghost Chain

Must Read

A latest Forbes article has taken a swipe at Ripple and the XRP Ledger, calling the XRPL and 19 different blockchain networks useful ghost chains.

The XRP Ledger has retained relevance within the blockchain ecosystem over a decade after its introduction, with wallets hosted on the community recording a gentle uptick to over 5.1 million at press time, demonstrating sustained curiosity amongst blockchain lovers.

Nevertheless, Forbes claims the XRPL is nothing greater than a zombie chain, a tag that has triggered sharp criticisms from business pundits. In a report printed yesterday, Forbes aimed to highlight 20 blockchains it believes are “zombie chains” with little utility.

Forbes Criticizes XRP Ledger

Whereas the report offered a desk of those networks, its focus was totally on XRP, creating the impression that the whole commentary was focused on the XRPL. The article famous that the XRPL has did not command vital international cash flows

Consequently, Forbes believes the blockchain community shouldn’t be near changing SWIFT within the cross-border sector. Nevertheless, regardless of SWIFT commanding a a lot better quantity, the XRPL has continued to impress within the remittance scene, with a number of companies leveraging Ripple’s ODL (now Ripple Cost) product for cross-border settlements.

Bitso, a number one crypto trade, confirmed final 12 months that it processed $3.3 billion price of remittance between Mexico and the U.S. in 2022 alone, primarily by means of XRP and stablecoins. As well as, Ripple’s Q1 2023 report revealed that ODL thrived, commanding practically $3 billion in This autumn 2022 regardless of the banking disaster on the time.

See also  EOS Demonstrates Safety Success with 2M EOS Restoration

Moreover the XRPL’s lack of ability to disrupt SWIFT, the Forbes article claims XRP is basically “ineffective” regardless of having a valuation of over $36 billion. Curiously, the metric with which they tagged XRP ineffective was collected transaction charges, which stood at $583,000 in 2023.

Nevertheless, the article failed to focus on that this low determine is a results of the XRP Ledger’s extraordinarily low charges when in comparison with legacy fee techniques. The XRPL solely costs a mean price of $0.0002 per transaction, whereas SWIFT costs something from $10 to $100 for a wire switch.

As well as, the XRPL doesn’t run on transaction charges. Relatively, it mandates these charges solely as a measure to remove spam transactions on the community. The truth that community contributors solely paid $583,000 in charges final 12 months regardless of finishing up over 1 million transactions a day is definitely a laudable feat for the XRPL.

A Disputed Listing of “Zombie Chains”

Forbes boldly labeled Ripple a “crypto zombie,” claiming that regardless of XRP’s excessive every day transaction quantity, it has little utility. The article claimed there are higher alternate options to SWIFT in the case of cross-border funds however failed to say that XRP instructions quicker transactions, a lot decrease charges, and a better success price than these alternate options.

The article additionally criticized Ripple’s newest feats, which embody the latest acquisition of Normal Custody and Belief and CBDC pilot applications with nations reminiscent of Palau. Forbes’ criticism hinges on the truth that these developments have come up after over a decade of Ripple’s existence.

See also  BitMEX Former CEO Arthur Hayes Declares His Favourite Altcoin! He Mentioned He Anticipated a 12x Improve!

They went on to checklist 20 blockchains they imagine are “good for nothing” with little utility. The checklist contains XRP, Cardano, Bitcoin Money, Litecoin, Web Laptop, Ethereum Basic, Stellar, Shares, Kaspa, Theta, Fantom, Monero, Arweave, Algorand, Movement, MultiversX, BitcoinSV, Mina, Tezos, and EOS.

Curiously, the article solely acknowledges Bitcoin and Ethereum as networks with adequate utility, which is a wierd conclusion. In keeping with Forbes, these “zombie blockchains” are both fork of Bitcoin and Ethereum or rivals.

The report has garnered criticism from a number of crypto business pundits. Panos Mekras, co-founder of Anodos Finance, known as the article a “piece of nonsense,” noting that its most important creator, Steven Ehrlich, didn’t perform adequate analysis.

Yeah… glorious piece of nonsense and misinformation by @Steven_Ehrlich who’s clearly misinformed and did not trouble to do the essential analysis for the piece he wrote. Sadly, these are the idiots who write on mainstream media and “lecture” the general public and the plenty.

— Panos 🔼{X} (@panosmek) March 27, 2024

As well as, one other XRP group determine identified that the XRPL’s cumulative charges for final 12 months are literally a constructive function for the community, stressing that these charges aren’t considered income however are burned.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles

OKX Pockets Integrates BaseX In Its Internet Extension to Allow Straightforward...

The favored crypto change OKX has lately introduced that it has added help for BaseX DEX in its pockets’s...

More Articles Like This